Review Process

IJAER accepts the electronic forms research articles, short communication works and it is a peer reviewed journal is one in which each feature article has been examined by people with credentials in the article's field of study before it is published. Collections of papers from conferences may be considered peer reviewed as well, if the original presentations were "invited" or examined by experts before being accepted. Papers which appear in sources like these are considered to be as reliable as humanly possible.

In "double blind" peer review, neither the author nor the reviewers know each others' identities. Not all peer review is double blind. As well, the literature of any profession may include journals written both for practitioners and for theorists.

After initial evaluation, the manuscripts are sent to referees which are determined editor and/or editorial board. If necessary, the number of referees can be increased by editor or Editorial Board. The referees are chosen from referee board according to their expertise. Referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript’s originality, methodology, contribution to the literature, presentation of results and support for the conclusions, and appropriate referencing of previous relevant studies. Referees might accept the manuscript, reject the manuscript or might require a revision for style and/or content.

How the Reviewer is selected

Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated.IJSER has highly dispersed & geographically separated team of review board members who make sure academic quality assurance of journal. 

Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate a manuscript for:

  • originality and significance of contribution
  • interest to social scientists and/or practitioners
  • international relevance
  • coverage of appropriate existing literature
  • adequacy of methodology, analysis and interpretation
  • clear, concise and jargon-free writing style
  • organization

Reviewers are asked to provide anonymous comments to the author and are also given the option of providing confidential comments to the editor. The comments to the author are also made available to other reviewers of the manuscript.
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within a week. Should the reviewers' reports contradict one another or a report is unduly delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. Reviewers and Senior Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript, and alternative reviewers may also be invited to review the manuscript at any time.
The Senior Editor is responsible for the decision to reject or recommend the manuscript for publication. This decision will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees.